Limbaugh is LOSING IT over the Republican CAVE-IN on their fools errand!
He just said "I was watching Fox News last night because they were doing a story on Obama's 37 % approval rating and one of the moderators (I won't name) said 'But that's not because of this crazy Ted Cruz shutdown strategy' and I screamed F U at the television! I used the F word."
AND...Funny
listening to Hannity and Limbaugh say OBAMA-Care must be ended then they
go to Jim Nance doing a commercial for "Insperity, helping people navigate the new
healthcare plan."
HAHAHA.....
My fellow Liberals WE ARE WINNING! F Limbaugh and Ted Cruz!
http://ChipShirley.Com/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What is it exactly, you think you're winning? The United States in incurring crushing debt and it's all because of liberal programs. Bush can be blamed as well for expanding Medicare.
ReplyDeleteThe US must borrow to run the government because we spend virtually all tax money on Social Security, Disability, Unemployment, Food stamps, Welfare, Housing, and countless other free shit programs. All that spending is killing the US and making us beholden to foreign governments. It is simply unsustainable. See Greece and Spain.
Again, what is it you're winning?????
You don't know how our fiat currency works and how welfare dollars return more dollars to the treasury than they take. Dollars don't just disappear after their first use. Money moves. The food stamps at the store pay the store and workers, the store pays the vendors, the vendors pay the producers...
DeleteWhat a nut,
DeleteThat's simply taking money and shuffling it around. There is no production of wealth. There is no production of goods or services. The food stamp user simply takes without producing anything to get those food stamps.
Secondly, mind explaining how food stamps put more dollars back into the Treasury? What you're saying is you take money from someone, under penalty of fine or jail, and give it to someone else. In turn that person gives it back to the one that it was originally taken from where they have to turn around and give it right back to the government. In the real world, that is not conducive to growth or creation of wealth. In Marxist fantasy land, I guess it sounds great.
The term "liberal" by the way ... used to mean liberal in the classical sense. Freedom and economic liberty. It was coopted by progressives in the early 2oth century when the country began to frown upon their support of Stalin, Hitler and eugenics.
ReplyDeleteRecently, liberals have tried bringing the term progressive out into the open again, believing the public has long forgotten their past.
What we're winning is moving the country in the direction of giving us full control of both houses of congress and the WH so we can finally start to accurately remember and learn from 'the past'...Which is...
ReplyDeleteBetween 1940-80 the wealthiest Americans paid between 70% to 90% federal income tax and that's what allowed us to build the American Dream. How else could we afford it? Between 1940-80 we fought and paid for WWII, Korean War, Vietnam War, we built our US Interstate Expressway system, Roads, Electrical Grid, Telephone, our main Bridges and Tunnels; we Made every Car we Drove and we wore just the Clothes we Sewed and WE WENT TO THE MOON SIX TIMES-AND WE PAID FOR IT ALL! Here's the link. Go to section 21.5 and Get out ye encyclopedias... TRUTH:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax_in_the_United_States#1930_-_1980
After WWII we were about the only country producing anything. Europe and Japan were destroyed and rebuilding, and using American goods to rebuild. Secondly, you could deduct virtually anything to reduce your tax load. When Reagan lowered tax rates he also did away with most deductions. Third, we didn't spend almost all our money on social programs like we do now. Today virtually everything we take in is spend on entitlement programs.
DeleteI know I've explained this before, we have no money to spend on anything. That's why we have to borrow to run the damn government.
In 2011 we took in 2.2 trillion in taxes. In 2011 we spent 2.2 trillion on social programs. We spent every cent, but we had to borrow 1.4TRILLION to run everything else..
In 2013 we took in 2.7 trillion in taxes. We spent 2.3 trillion on social programs. Obama is slated to spend 3.7 trillion even though we only took in 2.7 in taxes.
Understand? That why we have to reduce entitlement spending and get our debt under control. We simply cannot keep borrowing over a trillion dollars a year simply to run the damn government.
This is not rocket science. If you earn $60,000 a year but spend $120,000 through loans and credit cards how long do you think it will be before lenders see you has a bad risk ... as someone unable to repay all your obligations? It's the same thing with the US and it's lenders. They will eventually conclude our debt is too great and will not lend anymore. When that happens our currency collapses.
Understand that as out debt grows, which is around 16.7 Trillions dollars, our interest on that debt grows as well. Soon all our tax revenue will go to interest.
Please use your head.
To help make it clearer ...
ReplyDeletein 1940 we spent 11% of revenue on social programs.
in 1952 we spent 13% of total revenue on social programs.
in 1962 we spent 25% of revenue on social programs.
in 1972 we spent 36% of revenue on social programs.
in 1982 we spent 52% of revenue on social programs.
in 1992 we spent 55% of revenue on social programs.
in 2002 we spent 100% of revenue on social programs.
In 2012 we spent 88% of revenue on social programs.
I did not include education spending which would make these percentages even higher.
Democrat Anon2 here. Excellent post Dixie Dove! :)
ReplyDelete