-This post was prompted by some video I just saw on tv of two guys carrying exposed rifles to a speech being given by a 'gun control' advocate, Oregon State Senator, Ginny Burdick. I just thought 'what are the limits?' People with a 'right to carry' license are not required to hide their weapons. Should that be a rule? The picture of guys walking down the street with a handgun hanging in their hand is obviously too much.
March 12, 2013
GUN WRONGS
To 'right to carry' proponents...
Do you not realize that by carrying weapons in public you require public law enforcement to focus on you and not the real criminals who may be in the area you are in. You are effectively nullifying law enforcement in that area. And what would you expect any police force to focus on more than someone carrying a gun in public? Are they supposed to think "Oh, since he's showing his rifle in public, he must be carrying it legally..." Like criminals can't figure that out!!!???.....
-This post was prompted by some video I just saw on tv of two guys carrying exposed rifles to a speech being given by a 'gun control' advocate, Oregon State Senator, Ginny Burdick. I just thought 'what are the limits?' People with a 'right to carry' license are not required to hide their weapons. Should that be a rule? The picture of guys walking down the street with a handgun hanging in their hand is obviously too much.
-This post was prompted by some video I just saw on tv of two guys carrying exposed rifles to a speech being given by a 'gun control' advocate, Oregon State Senator, Ginny Burdick. I just thought 'what are the limits?' People with a 'right to carry' license are not required to hide their weapons. Should that be a rule? The picture of guys walking down the street with a handgun hanging in their hand is obviously too much.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment